The Best Binary Options Broker 2020!
Perfect For Beginners!
Free Demo Account!
Free Trading Education!
UK Watchdog Updates Blacklist of Unauthorized Binary Options Brokers
FCA has brought binary options within its regulatory perimeter alongside the implementation of the MiFID II.
The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) today shed light on an unregulated binary options broker representing itself under several brands, which have been providing professional investment services to UK residents without regulatory permission.
The watchdog warned that Zola Ltd, trading as BinaryOnline, has no association whatsoever with any FCA-licensed entity and added that it was flagged for operating and targeting UK citizens without a license.
BinaryOnline operates through https://www.binaryonline.com and has adopted several affiliated brands, a practice that the FCA describes a typical move for a scam company to gain the trust of unsuspecting clients.
The denouncements follow a suite of similar blacklistings over the last few months. Under the guidelines, companies offering to trade in derivatives to UK investors require licensing and oversight from the FCA.
FBS Launches Online Trading School – FBS Trading BootcampGo to article >>
The FCA has been quite active in policing binary options and in addition to regular warnings, it published in January a list of 94 firms that offer trading services to UK consumers without authorization.
In line with practices across most of the EU, the FCA has brought certain types of binary options within its regulatory perimeter alongside the implementation of the MiFID II, which came into force since January 3, 2020.
The regulator maintains a blacklist of binary option brokers based upon information received from consumers, partner agencies and from monitoring the online market.
The FCA is not the only government agency to move against binary options. In what UK police have described as the biggest operation of its kind, officers swooped on the offices of 20 binary options brokers to review their compliance documents and gather intelligence on different types of investment fraud.
The watchdog’s research in this area found the majority of consumers who invest in binary options lose money and that investors lost an average of £87,410 per day over the course of 2020.
6 Ways Binary Options Scam Can Cost You Money and How to Avoid It
By Markus Silvester – June 11, 2020 4:01 pm
The Best Binary Options Broker 2020!
Perfect For Beginners!
Free Demo Account!
Free Trading Education!
Binary options scams are in essence one of the reasons Fair Binary Options came to existence. We saw a niche that has potential but is full with fraud and unethical activities. As the binary options phenomenon has grown, so have various ways fraudulent binary options brokers found to trick their customers. While regulation from the side of CySEC and other bodies such as the FSA, ASIC and others did help to bring a minimum set of standards binary options brokers must adhere to, we are still seeing widespread use of shady practices that can cost traders money. Read more about regulators in binary options.
AMF Study Reveals Many Brokers Are Not Disclosing Risks Properly
In this respect it is also fair to say that not always binary brokers are those who cause losses. Many customers are not aware of risks that binary options trading carries. As with any other form of financial speculation, short-term trading can be very risky and this is one of the reasons customers who did not attain desired results sometimes make internet noise. However, this is not only their fault, as the recent research by the French stock market regulator – AMF revealed. Sometimes these risk disclaimers get lost under loads of advertising, pushy phone calls and false promises.
Yes, Binary Options Trading is Risky
We will show some of their results in this article, along with some binary options scam tactics we encountered while reading numerous e-mails on our support mail. In short, AMF found that some binary options brokers do not follow all standards and regulatory guidelines, and that they use advertising tactics that can trick customers into believing that binary options trading is not risky or in some cases that profits are even guaranteed. As we try to improve the transparency of binary options industry, this report, along with our own experiences can be used as an excellent guide for beginners who understand the risks to binary options trading and like the fact that there is an easy way to take part in financial markets.
As the number of traders grows, so does the number of brokers in this very competitive industry. Many of them are regulated now and are bound to provide good service most of the time. It is rarely that Fair Binary Options experienced complaints about regulated binary options brokers, however there were instances when they have managed to steal from customers. Also there are many examples of binary options brokers that we never got any complaints about.
See FBO Blacklisted Brokers
AMF reports a year to year increase in blacklisted binary options brokers that already passed the number of Forex brokers (Picture 1). However we can imagine in the relation to sheer volume traded, forex brokers are much larger entities. We also want to say that many of brokers that are on AMF blacklist actually do not exist anymore and the real number is smaller.
Binary Options Scams in Mainstream Media
It is only natural that once something becomes popular as binary options did, that scams will show up and try to take their piece of the cake. Also, considering how only few years ago regulators didn’t pay much attention to scams (but enforced more and more measures towards regulated brokers), many traders had only one solution – to contact local media and tell their story about trading with binary scams.
Of course, scam brokers are ruining the reputation of the entire industry, but at the same time, unfair and unbalanced reporting caused maybe even more harm. Media outlets were flooded by stories about binary scams and warnings not to trade binary options, without any understanding of what binary options really are and how markets work.
Such stories grew bigger and bigger, even though they didn’t apply the basic rules of journalism, but were a mere witch hunt focused on the entire industry. Unfortunately, even the big and important websites and magazines, such as Times of Israel, frequently published stories where the other side wasn’t represented at all, or where the basic journalistic principle of “5W’s +H” (answering questions like who, what, when, where, why and how) remained unfulfilled. It was common to read a story published without a single fact and without additional research on what other side has to say. Even though it is completely understandable that media is in service of people, this is a great proof how good intentions don’t have to result in fairness for everyone. By focusing on victims, journalists often seemed to forget how they are reinforcing stereotypes about an entire industry. Undoubtedly, Times of Israel helped a handful of readers to warn others about scams and raise awareness about binary options scams.
Balance is the Key in Binary Options Industry
Instead of responsible reporting, media created an atmosphere of fear, and Times of Israel even urged to support the policy of banning all binary related industries from Israel. These stories took their toll, and many brokers decided to leave Israeli territory in every way and take their business elsewhere. Considering how the new law was planning to ban customer support companies and IT companies involved in the development of binary platforms and software, this decision is not surprising.
However, after initial enthusiasm, the Israeli Knesset decided to take a summer break and now it seems that the new law will be much less repressive. However, the damage is already done, and more than a few brokers went offshore.
That scams create an unfriendly environment for a specific type of business or industry is no news. The same thing happened not only with forex industry, just a couple of years ago, but also every time some novelty occurs in our lives. It can be concluded that despite the unfriendly treatment by the media, binary options are now entering a new, more serious era, as we all witnessed many brokers being closed down due to new market regulations and rising competition.
It would also be fair to remember our readers how we witnessed regulator’s ignorance for quite a long time. Instead of focusing on the safety of traders, they were acting in typically bureaucratic manner – always passing new bills, policies, rules, and fines focused on regulated brokers while leaving unregulated entities to operate as they like. Now even regulators are becoming more proactive and even stricter when it comes to ensuring a safe trading environment for the trader.
Examples of Retail Trading Forex Scams
There are many examples that these scams have hit the media, especially when it comes to Forex brokers. There was a case of Joel Ward which at the time rose to become a prominent speaker on trading on Forex and even spoke on topics of ethics in trading shortly before he was arrested for taking more than $15 million of his customers, of which he lost more than $1.8 million and spent much of the rest on a huge salary, “trading retreats” and other perks. Other prominent case is that of Russell Cline, whose brokerage firm promised huge returns only to notify customers they lost all the funds. Bloomberg reported on forex scam with a firm that targeted “safety” as marketing pitch, only to destroy their Indian customers’ investment. In binary options, which is a smaller industry, scams are usually smaller, but it does not mean they hurt people who got scammed less because of that. However, AMF shows, the number of complaints is growing.
So, take a look at our 6 ways binary options can cost you money to avoid them in the future!
1. Downplaying Risk of Binary Options Trading
We have already mentioned that one of the ways binary options brokers trick customers into depositing is to downplay risks to trading. This is outright fraud since in most cases they rely on uninformed customer. This binary options scam happens even before customer deposits money. While it is normal in every business to highlight pros and hide cons, with financial investing it is a good case practice not to hide risks from the customers. One of the worst things binary options broker representatives can do is make false assurances about returns, like, “3 out of 5 trades are won” – as AMF experienced during their mystery shopper tests.
According to a former employee of one scam broker who decided to give an interview to Times of Israel, operators who work with such brokers are taught to talk about binary options in a specific way, in order to convince the potential trader to make a deposit:
“Guralnek says he was told to present himself as a broker who made a commission on the trades and to emphasize how much money the customer could make while downplaying the risk. In fact, rather than helping customers to make smart trades, the “broker’s” true interest was for them to make unsuccessful predictions and lose their money.”
Yes, it is easy to trade binary options operationally, but some effort is needed to master skills that will make traders better at fundamental and technical analysis. Exaggerated claims of earning $17,000 per week as we are seeing all over the internet by people who promote BinaryBoom are really over the top and in our opinion can be qualified as binary options advertising scam. Also, one former US agent managed to recover $2 million stolen by BinaryBook scam. AMF highlights various cases where risk of losing the invested money was downplayed or not even mentioned. Also, some binary brokers were found not to do any due diligence by finding out more about the customer – like asking for job, income. In some cases not even. One of the big cases was the one of R. Swannel who showed results that did not stem from actual trading. He was sued by CFTC.
No Risk in Binary Options Automated Trading?
This scam technique is extremely popular among different binary trading robots that lately pop up from nowhere. Unlike in the past when there were only few reputable binary software available, nowadays everyone who has some programming knowledge can create basic software that looks legit. Such binary software are usually accompanied with catch phrases and elaborate storylines that have only one goal – to convince you that binary trading can make you a millionaire.
Here are some of the most important characteristics of such auto trading scams:
- very little to no information about the product
- great promises about certain amounts that can be made in limited time (for example $3,765 in the first day)
- video testimonials made with (mostly bad) actors
- pressuring trader by using psychological methods of manipulation
- displaying a fake number of available spots left
We at Fair Binary Options frequently wrote about this type of scams to help traders learn the difference between the good and the bad binary trading software. For example BinaryTrustMethod is a binary scam trying to convince traders they can make $2100 daily on auto pilot.
The worst type of binary options auto trading scams are those that downplay the risk while hiding behind the disguise of expertise. Such was Professional Binary Robot scam that was hiding behind the face of prog. George, but we managed to prove how this is just another fraudster trying to take traders’ money. Even though we prevented many traders from losing money, they were also traders who din’t read our warnings and ended up scammed and broke.
2. Cold Calling – Binary Options Scam with Privacy Breach
So, you are at home one day, minding your own business when a phone rings. A guy from some company is calling you to present you with an amazing investment opportunity. He is calling from a binary options broker XX and is asking you to deposit as little as YY to earn huge returns as high as 80% or even more. This sounds interesting so you say “tell me more”. Within this call the customer will in most cases receive information that is close to the binary options scam we described in the first point.
There is another problem with this, the binary broker representative has your phone number and you have no idea from where. The same thing happens with other products so it may not ring alarm. However, the same binary options scam happens with e-mails. This is something that is not always shared in public directories as the phone number. We call this cold calling – it usually involves binary options broker who buys user lists with personal information and calls potential customers. In some cases they buy leaked and stolen databases and call customers that already trade with different brokers.
Sometimes they even go further by using the data and calling the customers as if they already made a decision to deposit. In case the person is reluctant, they simply use simple manipulating techniques and make trader think less of himself as they wonder why is he unable or unready to grab this amazing opportunity.
One woman in Cyprus was arrested, trying to sell stolen data. She was employed with a broker who reported her to the police after suspicious behaviour. She will press charges soon. Read more about this interesting case.
One of the most interesting cases that involved cold calling was the one regarding SW1options broker. SW1options scam called a man, out of the blue. The man, who never took interest in binary trading before, quickly understood that there is no chance it will be possible to achieve returns promised. He simply declined the offer but warned British media about it. What happened later involves unlicensed business operations, false claims, and promises, and offshore account. Read more about SW1options binary scam.
We have had several situations where our own staff received e-mails from companies that they never signed up with. This is extremely bad since people must trust a broker when they promise to keep their information private. This way these scammers are destroying the reputation of the broker where they got the data and the whole industry. We already blacklisted some binary options brokers for this. Traders can see which ones are we talking about in our black list.
3. Hidden and unclear Terms & Conditions stipulations
This is a very broad area but we will try to explain this on an example, while other examples can be found in parts of this article discussing bonuses, withdrawal processing problem, etc. Recently a customer sent us an e-mail about not being able to withdraw profits from CTOption. We contacted the broker and they cited part of their T&C that mentions some 5%. This rule is not mentioned under section on withdrawals. In any case, the rule gives the broker right, according to T&Cs they wrote, that if the trader invests more than 5% of total capital in a trade, they have the right to stop the withdrawal for reasons that something suspicious is going on. This is the simple version of a very confusing paragraph in their T&Cs, that can be found on page 9.
Let us try to make this easier to understand – if a trader deposits $250 which is minimum with CTOption (under investigation), and invests the standard, at some places minimum $25 in a trade, the broker automatically has reason to stop withdrawals. So, only $5 trades, for 60 second trading are allowed. We see this as vey unethical and we have asked the responsible person about this, but never got an answer. T&Cs should not be a way for brokers to legitimate everything they do. We consider this a binary options scam. You will be able to read more about this on our blacklist soon. We also encountered T&Cs saying that initial deposit has to be traded at least once, and others where withdrawal is not allowed a month after last deposit.
Scam Brokers without Terms and Conditions
Some traders will find it interesting how there are brokers that support forex and binary options trading, or even binary trading robots that have no terms and conditions at all!
It is completely understandable how some may say that terms and conditions are completely redundant, especially nowadays when we must accept terms and conditions for every service, product etc. In case of any form of trading, make sure to take a good look at terms and conditions as they often help to tell a good broker from a bad one.
Some scam brokers simply don’t have terms and conditions, they are impossible to find or the link gets redirected to the homepage. Also, sometimes they copy terms and conditions belonging to another broker, and use them as their own. Scams are so careless that they live the name of the broker they stole from.
Serious terms and conditions are not few paragraphs that could have been written by a 1st-grade student. They are legal documents and they define every situation that may occur. Also, they are written in easy to understand way without any ambiguous sentences that can be translated in whatever the broker finds suitable. Also, keep in mind that every type of service, promotion, financial transaction etc. has to be described in terms and conditions.
ESMA and CySEC both took this issue seriously, especially regarding binary options bonuses that were the main tool of manipulation when it comes to funds. Their worry resulted in the termination of all bonuses offered by regulated brokers, and ban of any bonus offerings in the future. Unfortunately, this didn’t prevent scams to use terms and condition (or lack thereof) to practice unethical behaviour. Read more how binary scams use false data and vague terms and conditions to take your money.
4. Managed Accounts
Many binary options brokers offer 1-on-1 sessions, personal account managers and more to make their traders feel special by providing them with personalized care. However, we do not think it is ethical for brokers to offer managed accounts to clients. At this point, big part of binary options industry works in a way that broker takes the other side of the trade. It is a risk for the binary broker, however, if they found a customers, by doing 1. point, they have the upper hand. In this respect it makes no sense that anyone from that broker trades with the funds of the customer, since they have interest for customer to win. This is why we urge all customers never to cede the control of their account to account managers, senior analysts etc. They will mostly try to get traders to deposit more for this perk. In our experience, the broker first scores some winning trades, before something goes wrong, as did with the funds of this customer who lost $10,000.
One of the most famous cases of a scam involving managed accounts is the case of uTrade and their controlling shareholder Aviv Talmor. Mr. Talmor was prosecuted by Israeli authorities for misleading around 600 clients in the period from 2020 to 2020. According to the accusations, Talmor was using false advertising when trying to persuade people to do business with him. He was managing their money, without the license necessary to do that kind of business necessarily.
More about the regulation of binary trading read here.
ISA is also persuaded that every trader was presented with an account that contained only imaginary money, while at the same time, the real money was deposited to another account controlled by the company. This accrued 12 million USD difference between the fake accounts and the real cash that was being held in the uTrade bank account. So, according to this case, Talmor provided account management without having necessary license, mislead traders in the very beginning, used fraudulent ways like fake accounts to motivate traders to invest even more, and held their money in the special account, unavailable to traders. Keep this in mind before accepting any offers for account management.
If Tommy and Ronald Rutgersson knew this information, this would save them €100,000 they lost with SecureOptions scam. The two brothers first god a cold call by a flirty agent who convinced them to make a nice and big deposit. Then, they communicated with their 3 managers and, unfortunately lost all their money. This also proves that account management is not limited to allowing someone else to trade for you, but it also comes in different forms such as advice by ‘trading experts’ who put their own interest in the first place and basically know nothing about trading strategies.
5. Bonuses as Binary Options Scam
As of December 2020, CySEC regulated brokers can no longer provide binary options bonuses!
Bonus terms and conditions are one of the most frequent cases we get. All brokers offer bonuses and that is fine for the most part. The crucial thing is that the customer understands the terms and conditions and accepts them. In most cases, bonuses are a great way for traders who understand what they are doing to score well, however, many traders do not understand terms and conditions. We think brokers need to explain this to binary options traders before they get a chance to accept it. Recently we also wrote about the stand that CySEC made about the matter. In short, traders should be informed and binary options brokers should make sure to get the acceptance of a bonus in written.
We at Fair Binary Options will not accept any explanations that the customer said yes over the phone. We think brokers should make sure the bonus is accepted in some sort of written form – as regulator requests in order not to be seen as binary options scam. It is just a small effort. Also, turnover rules must be confined to bonus alone and not include deposited money. We want to warn all traders here that widely accepted practice, after bonus was received, is that all trades that end in the money are counted as bonus profits, while all trades that are lost are subtracted from the money deposited by the trader. This is an unfortunate rule that everyone should be aware of.
Still, brokers who don’t operate under a license are under no obligation to respect CySEC directives or regulatory guidelines by any other government body. This means that they operate in an area that leaves traders unprotected, which is a fertile ground for many scam brokers. This doesn’t mean that all unregulated brokers are scams, but traders should still be careful and research brokers before making a final decision (and initial deposit in the end). Here you will find 3 binary scams you should definitely avoid!
6. Refusal to Process Withdrawal
This is one of the worst binary options scams, the one that usually is the last step, before regulators or sites such as Fair Binary Options get involved. There are some cases when traders just do not understand the procedure and everything gets solved after their ID verification documents are submitted. This is not a binary options scam. ID verification is important for binary options brokers, showing they obey AML regulations – you can read more about it in our post on money laundering. If this was done, than problems involve bonus terms and conditions as well as other types T&C restrictions.
Read more about Money Laundering in Binary Options
In most of these cases, binary options brokers do not answer calls, do not return emails. Sometimes their support personnel just quotes T&C without any connection to the case or claims that bonus turnover has not been reached when in fact it has. There are many ways to do this. In most cases, if it is really a binary options scam, the broker will not return calls and in many cases they ask for more money to be deposited. In some cases, scam brokers make it hard, probably hoping the customer will give up. Since we cannot see all the volume of scams in the industry, we cannot tell how many people give up. AMF noticed this too
“It is sometimes necessary to insist in order to receive a promise of withdrawal over the telephone, but not without being asked, once again, to add more funds or send a bank card number. Some sites use the same sales techniques as when the account was opened to dissuade the client from withdrawing their funds.”
The already mentioned former employee of a scam broker explained how the basic practice is to keep the customer waiting. Withdrawal process would take extremely long amount of time during which the customer would be convinced to make further investments. In case the trader is persistent to get his money back, things take ugly turn:
“…very often the company would stop taking their calls, or send them an email saying ‘we suspect you of fraud’ and freeze all their funds. Because the customer didn’t know the real name or location of their salesperson, “they had nowhere to turn to get their money back,” explains Guralnek.
Scam brokers are often registered in one country, have their funds located in another, and customer support in third. This way, the customer is left confused and helpless in case something goes wrong.
One day, FBO team received an email sent by a reader who encountered exactly this type of scam. The trader made a deposit with BinaryDas, and then lost all his money, all because of their ‘risk-free’ trades. His designated manager simply downplayed the risk. Our reader was determined to balance out his losses, so made another deposit. He managed to achieve incredible profits, but as soon as he wanted to withdraw, he was informed how that is impossible. They made different claims: how his account is under investigation and how he has to pay a hefty fee. As it turns out, he was not the only one, as many other BinaryDas traders reported that broekr blocked their accounts as soon as they became profitable. Find out more about BinaryDas scam.
Binary Options Scams Complaints
In this article we tried to show several most common ways that people can lose their funds from unethical and fraudulent brokers. These binary options scams are actually easy to avoid if traders do their due diligence. Fair Binary Options is trying to provide the best info on binary options scam brokers as well to direct traders toward legitimate service providers.
This is not an easy task since ever more binary options brokers are entering the market and being market as a fraud by regulators (see Picture 1). In many cases our experience is good, however, later, the broker turns out to be a scam. This is where customers come in and give us info by sending us e-mails about their experiences. We try to investigate and sort things out with the broker if possible. If not we will blacklist these brokers, labeling them binary options scam.
Стаж: 9 лет 2 месяца
Данный плагин делает наиболее удобной выдачу предупреждений игрокам за нарушение правил. Выданные предупреждения при этом больше не будут оставаться незамеченными. Система устроена таким образом, что игрок не сможет играть дальше до тех пор, пока предупреждение не исчезнет с его экрана. На время, пока игрок предупреждён, его экран затемняется, он не может двигаться, стрелять, его нельзя убить (кроме, как взрывом от C4) и над его головой отображается иконка (в виде барашка ), давая другим понять, что этот игрок предупреждён администратором.
- Поддержка мультиязычности
- Настройка причин предупреждения/наказания через файл конфигураций
- Сохранение предупреждений на определённый период времени
- Настройка команды наказания при помощи тегов
- Отображение чат-сообщений о предупреждениях в зависимости от настроек квара amx_show_activity
- Множество макроконстант для гибкой настройки плагина
- Director HUD Message (dhudmessage.inc)
- Engine (engine.inc)
- Fakemeta (fakemeta.inc)
- Ham Sandwich (hamsandwich.inc)
- nVault (nvault.inc)
- warnmenu – отобразить меню предупреждений (консоль клиента)
- say /warn – отобразить меню предупреждений (общий чат)
- say_team /warn – отобразить меню предупреждений (командный чат)
Q: Для чего нужна настройка USE_TIME_IN_PUNISHMENT_COMMAND? На что именно она влияет?
A: Данная настройка определяет, будет ли отображаться время в меню причин и в меню подтверждения действия при наказании игрока. Если в команде наказания не будет задействован тег , то никакого смысла отображать время в меню нет.
Q: Для чего нужна настройка USE_SERVER_PUNISHMENT_COMMAND? На что именно она влияет?
A: Данная настройка определяет, от чьего имени будет выполняться команда наказания. Если строка закомментирована, то команда выполнится от имени администратора, который назначил наказание. Если же строка раскомментирована, то команда выполнится от имени сервера.
Q: Для чего нужна настройка DEFAULT_PUNISHMENT_TIME? На что она влияет?
A: Данная настройка определяет время наказания в минутах по умолчанию, которое будет использовано в том случае, если файл конфигураций не существует, либо неверно настроен, либо пуст и если в команде наказания задействован тег , разумеется.
Beyond ‘he’ and ‘she’: The rise of non-binary pronouns
Share this with
These are external links and will open in a new window
These are external links and will open in a new window
Close share panel
In the English language, the word “he” is used to refer to males and “she” to refer to females. But some people identify as neither gender, or both – which is why an increasing number of US universities are making it easier for people to choose to be referred to by other pronouns.
Kit Wilson’s introduction when meeting other people is: “Hi, I’m Kit. I use they/them pronouns.” That means that when people refer to Kit in conversation, the first-year student at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee would prefer them to use “they” rather than “she” or “he”.
As a child, Wilson never felt entirely female or entirely male. They figured they were a “tomboy” until the age of 16, but later began to identify as “genderqueer”.
“Neither end of the [male/female] spectrum is a suitable way of expressing the gender I am,” Wilson says. “Sometimes I feel ‘feminine’ and ‘masculine’ at the same time, and other times I reject the two terms entirely.”
Earlier this year, Wilson asked friends to call them “Kit,” instead of the name they (Wilson) had grown up with, and to use the pronoun “they” when talking about them.
Transgender: Applies to a person whose gender is different from their “assigned” sex at birth
Cisgender: Applies to someone whose gender matches their “assigned” sex at birth (ie someone who is not transgender)
Non-binary: Applies to a person who does not identify as “male” or “female”
Genderqueer: Similar to “non-binary” – some people regard “queer” as offensive, others embrace it
Genderfluid: Applies to a person whose gender identity changes over time
Sharing one’s pronouns and asking for others’ pronouns when making introductions is a growing trend in US colleges.
For example, when new students attended orientation sessions at American University in Washington DC a few months ago, they were asked to introduce themselves with their name, hometown, and preferred gender pronoun (sometimes abbreviated to PGP).
“We ask everyone at orientation to state their pronouns,” says Sara Bendoraitis, of the university’s Center for Diversity and Inclusion, “so that we are learning more about each other rather than assuming.”
A handful of universities go further and allow students to register their preferred pronouns in the university computer systems – and also a preferred name.
At the University of Vermont, which has led this movement, students can choose from “he,” “she,” “they,” and “ze,” as well as “name only” – meaning they don’t want to be referred to by any third-person pronoun, only their name.
“It maximises the student’s ability to control their identity,” says Keith Williams, the university’s registrar, who helped to launch the updated student information system in 2009. Most people stick to the default option, “none”, which means they are not registering a pronoun – presumably because they are content to let people decide whether they are a “he” or a “she”.
Out of about 13,000 students currently enrolled, some 3,200 have entered preferred names in the system, and about half of them have specified preferred pronouns, Williams says. He adds that this doesn’t necessarily mean they are transgender – they could be non-transgender students specifying “he” and “she”.
At Harvard University, which followed Vermont’s example at the beginning of this academic year, about half of the approximately 10,000 students registered in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences have specified preferred pronouns, and slightly more than 1% of those – about 50 out of 5,000 – chose pronouns other than “she” or “he”, according to registrar Mike Burke.
At most other US universities the growing use of “non-binary” pronouns remains less formalised but is often encouraged in various ways. Signs and badges found throughout campuses display slogans such as Pronouns Matter or Ask Me About My Pronouns. Professors may be invited to training sessions at the start of each year and are sometimes urged to include their pronouns in their email signature, for example, “John Smith (he/him/his)”.
A card developed by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee LGBT Resource Center in 2020 has been widely reproduced and distributed across the US.
One side of the card lists eight pronouns, from “ey” to “zie,” and illustrates how they change depending on their role in a sentence. Instead of “he/she,” “him/her,” “his/her,” “his/hers,” and “himself/herself” it would be:
- “ey,” “em,” “eir,” “eirs,” and “eirself”, or
- “zie,” “zim,” “zir,” “zirs,” and “zirself”
The other side of the card has fill-in-the-blank sentences to give people an opportunity to practise using the unfamiliar pronouns.
“The intention behind it was to ensure that the campus was fostering an inclusive environment,” says Jennifer Murray, the director of the resource centre.
All the pronouns on the card were already in use, Murray says, either among students or members of Milwaukee’s LGBT community. Although it might have been simpler to suggest just one non-binary pronoun, she says the staff of the resource centre didn’t want to “limit folks’ choices”.
The alternatives to “he” and “she” are myriad. Wikipedia’s gender-neutral pronouns page lists 14 “non-traditional pronouns” in English, though three are variants of “ze”. Other online resources for the non-binary community, however, offer hundreds of options.
Some terms come from foreign languages – such as the German-inspired “sie” – others from fiction. For example, “ze” and “per” are the pronouns of a future utopia Marge Piercy describes in her feminist sci-fi novel Woman on the Edge of Time (1976). Some are drawn from the plant or animal worlds, or refer to mythical beings with which the individual may identify.
It’s is not the first time people have tried to coin new pronouns. Writers have long been frustrated by the lack of a neat way to refer to someone of unknown gender – “he or she” is clunky, and if you use it several times in quick succession, “your writing ends up looking like an explosion in a pedants’ factory”, as Guardian columnist Lucy Mangan once put it.
A linguist at the University of Illinois, Dennis Baron, has catalogued dozens of proposed gender-neutral pronouns, many – including “ip,” “nis,” and “hiser” – dating back to the 19th Century.
Most of these made little impact, though one – “thon”, a contraction of “that one” – got into two American dictionaries.
Overall, though, Baron calls the gender-neutral pronoun an “epic fail” and reckons that new pronouns such as “ze” may not survive. But both he and Sally McConnell-Ginet, a Cornell University linguistics professor who researches the link between gender, sexuality, and language, think the singular “they” – as used for example by Kit Wilson – has a chance of success.
This use of “they” annoys some grammarians. While it does feel natural for most English speakers to say something like “Someone lost their wallet,” critics argue that “they” should really only be used to refer to plural nouns. And even those comfortable with “Someone lost their wallet” may have doubts when “Someone” is replaced by a person’s name.
It’s for this reason that when the pronoun registration system was developed at the University of Vermont in 2009, professors at first argued “ze” would be acceptable, but “they” would not. “They” was only added as an option in 2020.
But English has a precedent for a plural pronoun coming to be used in the singular – the pronoun “you”. Until the 17th Century a single person was addressed with “thou” and “thee”. Later “you” became perfectly acceptable in both plural and singular. Neither McConnell-Ginet nor Baron sees any reason why the same could not happen with “they”.
Last week Washington Post copy editor Bill Walsh sent an email to the newsroom – probably the most popular email he will ever send, as he put it – saying the singular “they” was sometimes permissible, and “also useful in references to people who identify as neither male nor female”.
Non-binary in the UK
Most students have “some level of understanding about pronouns”, which was not the case a few years ago, says the National Union of Students’ LGBT officer, Fran Cowling. NUS name badges now include space for preferred pronouns.
Cambridge University students started a campaign called Make No Assumptions about a year ago. One of its badges (above) prompts readers to ask about the wearer’s pronouns. Another has empty spaces for pronouns to be filled in.
Emrys Travis, Cambridge University Student Union’s LGBT+ campaigns officer, uses “they,” “them,” and “their,” but also “ey,” “em,” and “eir” with trans friends. “A lot of them mess up – repeatedly, often,” Travis says. “As long as I think they’re trying, it doesn’t bother me.”
Travis asked their director of studies to email each of their (Travis’s) lecturers with a request to use “they” and “them” when referring to Travis and none objected. “Cambridge, in general, is a great place to be trans,” they say.
However, learning to use new pronouns or the singular “they” is not easy.
Like Harvard, Ohio University gave students the option to register their preferred name and pronoun this year, but not all professors were ready for it. Some thought “they” was a typo on their student rosters, says LGBT centre director delfin bautista (bautista writes their name without any capital letters).
Slip-ups with preferred names are rarer than with preferred pronouns, bautista says, but can happen too. Calling someone by their rejected birth name is termed “deadnaming”. More broadly, referring to a person in a way that does not reflect their gender identity is called “misgendering”.
When students suspect that professors may not get the point of gender-neutral pronouns, they may play it safe and stick with “he” or “she”.
Sarah Grote, an Ohio University student, uses “they/them” with close friends but hasn’t entered this in the student information system to avoid inconveniencing or alienating professors. “I still need their recommendations… and this is still south-eastern Ohio,” Sarah says.
In another socially conservative region, one university had to swiftly backtrack after tentatively starting a discussion about pronouns this summer. Donna Braquet, director of the Pride Center at the University of Tennessee posted an explanation of gender-neutral pronouns on the university website in August and encouraged people on campus to ask one another about their pronouns.
The goal was to make the climate more trans-friendly, but it was widely mistaken for a change in university policy. Some of the press coverage imagined that “he” and “she” were being outlawed. One opinion column even used the headline “New pronouns for the traveling freak show”. State and federal lawmakers complained to the university, and the post was removed the following week.
It’s not just in US universities that gender-neutral language is advancing. Last year, Facebook gave users the option to customise gender beyond male and female, and pick a pronoun from “he”, “she”, and “they”. This summer the Oxford Dictionaries website added the honorific “Mx”, defining it as “a title used before a person’s surname or full name by those who wish to avoid specifying their gender or by those who prefer not to identify themselves as male or female”. Meanwhile, Caitlyn Jenner and the controversy over Benedict Cumberbatch playing a non-binary character in the film Zoolander 2 have kept the subject of gender identity topical.
Universities, however, remain the most fertile ground for new pronouns.
kat baus, a non-binary student who graduated from Harvard this year – and who also writes their name without capital letters – regrets that the university’s computer system was not introduced earlier. “It would have been a lot easier and less awkward,” baus says.
baus sent emails or visited professors during office hours to explain their gender identity and pronouns. In smaller classes they (baus) brought it up when introducing themself.
“I don’t know a single trans person who likes having that conversation,” baus says.
Being able to do it with the click of a mouse would have allowed them to get straight down to their work in class, baus says – and would have allowed their classmates to get straight down to theirs.
It is sometimes difficult to determine somebody’s gender by sight but what if you’re blind? Mike Lambert recently experienced this problem when he attended a course on equality and diversity.
“I listen hard to Nina’s voice. There’s something soft and tentative about it – but the pitch is unmistakeably male. I tell myself that any concerns I have about Nina’s gender are a thing of little consequence. The whole point of the day is equality and diversity, and I shouldn’t get so hung-up trying to slot people into neat pigeon-holes. And then, I’m struck by a horrifying thought. How am I going to get through more than a couple of sentences without committing myself to ‘he’ or ‘she’, ‘his’ or ‘hers’?”
Subscribe to the BBC News Magazine’s email newsletter to get articles sent to your inbox.
The Best Binary Options Broker 2020!
Perfect For Beginners!
Free Demo Account!
Free Trading Education!