The Saffa Method Review

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • Binarium

    The Best Binary Options Broker 2020!
    Perfect For Beginners!
    Free Demo Account!
    Free Trading Education!
    Sign-up Bonus!

  • Binomo

    Trustful Broker!


Fighting online scams since 2020

Brith Method and Saffa Method scam

This Saffa Method review is a quick warning – this binary options program is a scam made to lose your money.

Table of Contents

What is Saffa Method about

The alleged creator of this program Jake Mason claims that can make you earn hundreds of thousands of dollars within one month thanks to his Saffa Method.

He trades binary options and allegedly is willing to give you everything you need to succeed for free.

It’s a recycled scam

This method is the most cloned binary options scam we have ever seen. Every time it targets a different country, now it’s obviously South Africa with the Saffa Method.

But scammers did not bother to invent a new name, they have already used Jake Mason with the Kiwi Method, meanwhile the photo of the guy is the same as in the Irish Method.

Look at the picture on the right and you’ll see the proof. So it is not necessary for us to again through everything, you can read our previous reviews of this method.

How Saffa Method really works

Let us remind the real purpose of the Saffa Method. People who created get paid by their partner broker for referring new depositing clients.

This is why you will have to first deposit money with a broker that you cannot choose. Only the you will get access to the Saffa Method. But if you trade with this method, you will lose your deposit.

The Brit Method

Another name of this scam is The Brith Method. It is again presented by Jason Taylor. Everything else is the same, so beware!


The Saffa Method is a well-known scam that is losing money to real traders, so stay away from it.

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • Binarium

    The Best Binary Options Broker 2020!
    Perfect For Beginners!
    Free Demo Account!
    Free Trading Education!
    Sign-up Bonus!

  • Binomo

    Trustful Broker!

People interested in making money in binary options trading should always start learning on a free demo with a regulated broker.

Standardized Acceptance Factor Average (SAFA): Conceptual Framework

Academic journal article International Journal of Business and Management Science

Standardized Acceptance Factor Average (SAFA): Conceptual Framework

Article excerpt

The review process is the most common way to make a decision on publishing an academic article. Generally, this decision is made by a chief editor based on two or more double blind reviews. An editor rarely uses an open or non-blind review to make a decision (Walsh, Rooney, Appleby and Wilkinson, 2000; Koop and Poschl, 2006). Making such decision is often associated with human errors (Lawrence, 2003). For example, if two reviewers provide different recommendations on a manuscript, an editor meets more responsibility to make the final decision. It seems that there may be a chance of unintended bias in a traditional decision making process due to this disagreement between or among the reviewers. An editor tends to resolve this disagreement by assigning a third reviewer. In some cases the decision making process can go further for another review or re-review. However, the non-uniformity in recommendations made by reviewers still may persist. In order to minimize such bias in decision making, a quantitative approach can be employed that is a combination of the traditional review method and mathematical tools. This new framework which is named ‘Standardized Acceptance Factor Average (SAFA)’ tends to provide more convenient and efficient decision making. In this article we tried to articulate the conceptual framework of the SAFA. We intend to avoid any mathematical jargon of this framework in this article for comprehensive understanding.

Prolog to the Conceptual Framework of the SAFA

A manuscript is a written script of academic work with several aspects namely logic, consistency and structure (Rude, 1991; Fox, 2000; Linssen, 2001). Is a reviewer always sufficiently efficient to focus on all of these components? Let’s say, a reviewer is eligible to review a manuscript; how is the opinion presented in the review report to be measured and summarize all the different aspects of a manuscript in a fair and comprehensive manner (Groves, 2006)? Sometimes from two or three review reports a conclusive decision still needs to be made by the editor in order to maintain the efficiency of the decision making process. However it is done, the human error becomes one of the most concerning issues in the review process.


There has been substantial improvement in the review process over the last few decades; it is still debatable whether a traditional review process is the best way to judge a piece of academic work (Brown 2004; Bloom, 2006; Philica, 2006). Undoubtedly, reviewing a manuscript before publication is well established as the most effective way of publishing, with several adjustment and improvement stages comprising the review process. A crucial question is perpetually asked by the author(s) and readers; how efficient is the recommendation made by a reviewer, on which the chief editor will base his/her decision (Elliott and Stern, 1997; Safa, 2008c)? If it is possible to incorporate the reviewers’ efficiency in making a decision then a fairer and more comprehensive decision can be made rather than just relying completely on a reviewer’s ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ (Safa, 2006; Safa, 2008a; Safa, 2008b; Safa, 2008d) .

A standard review report (Instrument A.1, see the Appendix) that comprises a set of constructs regarding various aspects of a manuscript that is commonly used in journal publications (Ward E. Barnes Library, 2006; CFA, 2007). The second part of a review report is a set of recommendations (Instrument A.4, see the Appendix) that concludes the final recommendation from the assigned reviewer. In this paper we have revealed the amended and proposed set of recommendations (Appendix A.4) designed for the SAFA framework. It is to be noted here that a standard review report usually does not provide any range for the recommendation “Accepted with minor revision”.

The reviewers use these constructs on an n-point Likert scale so that the level of their agreement or disagreement with each construct can be precisely marked. …

Subscribe to Questia and enjoy:

  • Full access to this article and over 14 million more from academic journals, magazines, and newspapers
  • Over 94,000 books
  • Access to powerful writing and research tools


19 • Average

Write a review

Write a review

Reviews 19

Great job.

The team was great, they were very pleasant and considerate, and took really good care of the furniture. I was really worried about wooden furniture not being damaged, the guys reassured me and here I am in my new apartment and everything is intact. Great job!

Abdul is a fraud

Abdul is a fraud. He’ll take your bike within half an hour. But will deliver it after 2 months. I tried transporting by bike from Bangalore to native. Had to get police intervention to get the job done.

Dear Vin diesel, Please note you are mistaken and you put the review on the wrong place., We do not have a client with this name in our work details. Please share your invoice to us, We do not have any branches in Banglore or India. We are based in Dubai. UAE.

E: [email protected]
T: +971 65393115/ +971509765166


WORST SERVICE. I called him to shift my bike from Bangalore to Kochi. I paid Rs 4450 and before making payment he told I will get the bike within 2 days. Once I made the payment he told it will take 4 days. And finally I got my bike after 1 week. He won’t take our call, nor reply to our messages as well. Even it was not a door delivery as told to me, I had to travel around 10kms to get my bike. He didn’t packed my bike as assured to me. There was damages to my bike as well. Pls don’t opt for his service.

Worst relocators, fraud and cheat

Worst relocators. Dont ever trust them.
I transported by Yamaha Fazer from Bangalore to Hyderabad with Safa relocators.
my Bike was picked up on 13-June-2020 and they promised delivery on 15-June-2020. I expected them to pack my bike in front of me, but they told that they can pack only at go-down and rode the bike away (Bike had almost half tank petrol).
AFter the bike was taken, one person Abdul called me and asked me to take insurance for 600Rs. I told it is too high, so, he asked me to take insurance for 450Rs, without which he cannot transport the bike. So, in total, i had to pay him 3500Rs.
I asked him for insurance details, but he did not share it with me and told he will share later.
I asked them to send picture of bike before and after packing, but they never sent it. June15 onwards, I started calling them. they either disconnect my call or, sms ‘will call back’. finally after calling 107 times (really i called 107 times), they picked my call and told vehicle is in a place called Kurnool and will reach the next day. I asked them to send picture of bike and insurance copy, but no response.
I called again next day. next day also same. i called 135 times and they picked up call finally and told vehicle will come by 18th June due to some lorry breakdown. ignored my calls and messages.
the same continued till 22-June, when they finally delivered it. During delivery, when they unpacked, due to improper packing, my bike seat got torn. I asked for insurance and then they are now not responding/picking my calls or messages.
What should I do now?
How can i get my damages fixed?
Nobody should go for this fraud Safa relocators

The sales team was professional and…

The sales team was professional and very helpful. On the day the packing team arrived, packing was done very professionally, no furniture was damaged or nothing got broken, and under extremely difficult situations the team was amazing! I highly recommend their services and they know what they are doing.

Worst service ever. they will not…

Worst service ever. they will not deliver ur bike on time and also u will get ur bike with full scratches. They will promise to do 3 cover packing but they won’t even do single cover packing.
All the good comments written here will be by the owner itself.

Proffessional and reliable

Proffessional and reliable. Highly recomondable.

Page load speed analysis

Total page load time

Welcome to homepage info – get ready to check Saffa Method best content for South Africa right away, or after learning these important things about

We analyzed page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Page optimization

HTML 21.3 kB
Images 1.8 MB
Javascripts 616.9 kB
CSS 490.2 kB

In fact, the total size of main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Saffa Method needs image optimization as it can save up to 208.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 408.2 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 406.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Network requests diagram

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original, 72% (64 requests) were made to and 11% (10 requests) were made to The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (532 ms) relates to the external source

Additional info on

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Saffa Method. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • Binarium

    The Best Binary Options Broker 2020!
    Perfect For Beginners!
    Free Demo Account!
    Free Trading Education!
    Sign-up Bonus!

  • Binomo

    Trustful Broker!

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Binary Options Wiki
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: